As Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his deputy, DK Shivakumar, vie for supremacy, the Congress in Karnataka finds itself in a precarious balancing act between ambition and unity.
Few states are as emblematic of factional intrigue as Karnataka. Despite the Congress unquestioned superiority in the southern state, the party’s unity is threatened by a fierce power struggle between its two formidable figures: Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his ambitious deputy, DK Shivakumar.
Despite Shivakumar’s seemingly conciliatory remarks urging party members not to misuse Siddaramaiah’s name or fan media speculation, the undercurrents of discord are unmistakable.
The real message in the latest skirmishing, decoded in the backrooms of Karnataka’s political circles, was one of frustration. Shivakumar, long considered the Congress’s bulwark in the state, was now being forced to navigate a terrain where his own leadership ambitions were being systematically undermined.
The Congress’s resounding victory in the 2023 Karnataka Assembly polls was, in many ways, a poisoned chalice. While Siddaramaiah, the veteran warhorse, was given the top job, Shivakumar was placated with the deputy CM post and the state Congress presidency. The duration of this arrangement, however, was never explicitly laid out. Party insiders claim that there was an implicit two-and-a-half-year timeline before Shivakumar would ascend to the top post. Others insist that Siddaramaiah was chosen for a full five-year term. The ambiguity has proven to be fertile ground for factionalism.
Now, over a year since that power-sharing arrangement was brokered, the uneasy equilibrium is unravelling.
There is more than just personal ambition at play. At its core, the battle is a contest between two vastly different political legacies. Siddaramaiah, a socialist at heart, built his career championing backward castes and minorities. His politics is rooted in the legacy of Devaraj Urs, the last Congress leader to serve two full terms as Karnataka’s chief minister. If Siddaramaiah stays in power for another year, he will surpass Urs.
Shivakumar, in contrast, embodies the Congress’s organizational muscle. A Vokkaliga strongman with an unrivaled network of influence, he played a pivotal role in reviving the party’s fortunes in Karnataka. His backers argue that he deserves to lead, having done the heavy lifting in the 2023 election. More crucially, his support base sees the current attempts to sideline him as a veiled effort to prevent him from staking his claim for the top job in 2028.
Shivakumar, for all his political acumen and deep-rooted influence, faces resistance from within the party’s backward-caste lobby, which sees him as a threat to their long-standing dominance. Siddaramaiah, a leader who built his career on mobilizing backward communities, continues to wield significant influence over these groups, reinforcing the perception that his exit would disrupt the delicate caste equilibrium Congress has cultivated over the years.
Shivakumar’s dilemma is twofold. While he remains the party’s most resourceful troubleshooter, his influence is largely confined to the Vokkaliga community, a powerful but numerically smaller bloc. His elevation to the chief ministership would risk alienating key Congress constituencies, particularly Dalits and OBCs, who form the bedrock of Siddaramaiah’s support.
For now, Siddaramaiah appears to hold the upper hand. His government, despite allegations of corruption in the MUDA scam (linked to land allotments) has remained largely unscathed. This poses a dilemma for Shivakumar, who cannot openly challenge the Chief Minister without risking the perception of disloyalty.
History offers a grim reminder of what happens when Congress’s internal contradictions go unresolved. The last time Karnataka witnessed such a fierce factional war was in the early 2000s, when the conflict between S.M. Krishna and Mallikarjun Kharge ultimately weakened the party’s grip on the state. The Congress risks repeating the same mistake if it fails to decisively address the Siddaramaiah-Shivakumar standoff.
The irony, of course, is that both leaders need each other. Siddaramaiah requires Shivakumar’s organizational muscle to keep the Congress afloat, while Shivakumar needs Siddaramaiah’s mass appeal to sustain his own ambitions.
Comments