As Maharashtra gears up for an especially critical Assembly election, the battle for Mumbai, a city that accounts for a significant share of the state’s political power and economic clout, is shaping up around a theme of development versus obstruction.
The ruling Mahayuti coalition, composed of the Shiv Sena led by CM Eknath Shinde, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), and Ajit Pawar’s Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), has positioned itself as the champion of growth and infrastructure. They seek to capitalize on a series of high-profile projects initiated during their tenure, from the long-delayed Mumbai Coastal Road to the Atal Setu bridge.
The argument the Mahayuti will present to the voters is clear: the opposition, particularly Uddhav Thackeray’s faction of Shiv Sena (UBT), stood in the way of progress when the MVA government helmed by Thackeray was in power.
The Mahayuti will likely point to the Dharavi redevelopment project, which aims to transform one of Asia’s largest slums into a modern residential and commercial hub, and the ongoing Mumbai Metro expansion as prime examples of Thackeray’s alleged obstructionism. While the Coastal Road promises to cut down travel time between South Mumbai and the northern suburbs, Thackeray’s criticism of environmental concerns around these projects has led to accusations of stalling key development initiatives.
The Mahayuti will be positioning itself as a forward-looking government, one willing to make tough decisions for the future of the metropolis. The Dharavi project, for instance, is not merely about relocating slum dwellers but represents a vision of urban renewal that could unlock immense real estate value in one of the world’s most crowded cities.
The Mumbai Metro stands as another flashpoint in the development vs. destruction narrative. Uddhav Thackeray, as part of the MVA government, took a public stand against the construction of the Metro Car Shed in Mumbai’s Aarey forest—an urban green lung. While environmentalists praised his decision to halt work on the car shed to protect the forest, the Mahayuti government quickly reversed this after coming to power, shifting construction back to Aarey.
The Shiv Sena (UBT)’s emphasis on environmental protection stands in contrast to the ruling coalition’s aggressive push for urban transit expansion. For the Mahayuti, the Metro is a critical solution to the city’s traffic woes, one that Thackeray hindered during his brief reign.
For the Mahayuti coalition, this election will be an opportunity to showcase tangible achievements and portray the opposition as agents of delay. The Atal Setu, which connects Worli to Bandra, and the Coastal Road Project are symbolic of a city being upgraded to global standards. With Mumbai positioned as India’s financial capital, the coalition will frame its infrastructure push as essential for attracting investment and maintaining the city’s competitiveness on the global stage.
As the polls inch closer, the narrative of ‘development versus destruction’ will intensify. As voters weigh their options, the future of Mumbai’s landscape, both physical and political, will be shaped by this defining debate.
Comments