top of page

By:

Kiran D. Tare

21 August 2024 at 11:23:13 am

The Last Emperor

Even as his final World Cup ends in disappointment, Cristiano Ronaldo's influence on the game remains unmatched. At 41, when most footballers are remembered through grainy highlights and nostalgic documentaries, Cristiano Ronaldo was still trying to win a World Cup. Portugal's elimination at the hands of Spain in the Round of 16 has almost certainly brought down the curtain on the greatest international career the sport has seen without its ultimate prize. Ronaldo himself acknowledged before...

The Last Emperor

Even as his final World Cup ends in disappointment, Cristiano Ronaldo's influence on the game remains unmatched. At 41, when most footballers are remembered through grainy highlights and nostalgic documentaries, Cristiano Ronaldo was still trying to win a World Cup. Portugal's elimination at the hands of Spain in the Round of 16 has almost certainly brought down the curtain on the greatest international career the sport has seen without its ultimate prize. Ronaldo himself acknowledged before the tournament that this would be his last World Cup. The absence of a World Cup title will tempt many to place Ronaldo behind his great rival Lionel Messi, whose victory in Qatar in 2022 appeared to settle, once and for all, the debate over football's greatest player. Yet, football has always had an uneasy habit of allowing one tournament to overshadow an entire career. While the World Cup remains the sport's supreme prize, but it has never been a flawless measure of individual greatness. George Best never played in one. Johan Cruyff reached a final but never lifted the trophy. Ferenc Puskás lost two finals. Alfredo Di Stéfano never appeared at the tournament at all. Conversely, players of far lesser individual distinction have become immortals by virtue of a few unforgettable weeks every four years. Ronaldo belongs to the rarer category of footballers whose influence transcends a single competition. His career has always demanded a different yardstick. If Messi represents genius bestowed by nature, Ronaldo embodied genius manufactured through relentless self-improvement. Born in Madeira in 1985 to a working-class family, Ronaldo possessed extraordinary pace and technique but not the polished completeness that later became his trademark. His move to Manchester United F.C. in 2003 under the guidance of Sir Alex Ferguson transformed an exuberant winger into a disciplined machine. Hours of practice refined his weaker foot, strengthened his physique and sharpened an already formidable competitive instinct. His subsequent transfer to Real Madrid C.F. for what was then a world-record fee elevated him from star to institution. There he evolved into football's most devastating goal scorer. His rivalry with Messi transcended sport. Every weekend became another chapter in an extraordinary duel between two men who seemed intent on rewriting every statistical record available. Ronaldo eventually conquered Italy with Juventus F.C., returned briefly to Manchester United before embarking on an unexpected final act in Saudi Arabia with Al-Nassr FC. Critics dismissed the move as retirement in disguise. Instead, it accelerated football's migration towards the Gulf, encouraging other stars to follow and permanently altering the economics of the global transfer market. His influence extends beyond club football. Ronaldo became the most prolific scorer in men's international football, the most capped male international and the first player to score in six different World Cups. Portugal, once regarded as an entertaining but inconsistent football nation, matured into perennial contenders under his leadership. Victory at Euro 2016 and another UEFA Nations League title in 2025 ensured that his international career was decorated even if the World Cup remained elusive. Numbers alone, however, fail to explain Ronaldo's significance. He helped redefine what elite athletic longevity could look like. Meticulous attention to nutrition, sleep, recovery and conditioning turned him into perhaps football's greatest advertisement for sports science. Younger professionals increasingly copied his routines. He also anticipated the age of the athlete as a global corporation. Before personal branding became mandatory, Ronaldo understood that celebrity could be monetised independently of club loyalties. His CR7 label expanded into fashion, hotels, fragrances and digital media, while his social-media following reached unprecedented levels, making him one of the world's most influential public figures far beyond football. To detractors, Ronaldo could appear vain, theatrical and consumed by records. His emotional displays, extravagant celebrations and unmistakable confidence were interpreted as narcissism. But such criticism misses the essence of his appeal. His career has also mirrored football's transformation into a relentlessly commercial spectacle. The transfer fees, sponsorships and global audiences that accompanied him chart the sport's evolution from Europe's favourite pastime into a worldwide entertainment industry. Ronaldo was not merely its beneficiary but became one of its principal architects. History may ultimately rank Messi as the more naturally gifted footballer. But Ronaldo's legacy lies elsewhere. He demonstrated that age need not dictate decline, and that modern athletes can become multinational enterprises in their own right. This World Cup trophy will never bear Cristiano Ronaldo's fingerprints. The modern game, however, bears them everywhere.

Caste-based Census Sparks Nationwide Debate

Updated: Oct 22, 2024

Caste-based Census

Caste-based identities continue to dominate rural India, directly or indirectly shaping electoral outcomes. Many major elections are influenced by specific caste groups. After the Bihar government released the first phase of its caste-based socio-economic survey, the caste census became a hot topic. The results, backed by evidence, showed improvements in the living standards and social status of marginalised communities, both in cities and villages. With parties like the JDU and NCP backing a caste census, there is growing momentum for the government to conduct one. However, every story has two sides—joy and sorrow. Even Mahatma Gandhi, the Father of the Nation, raised concerns about the caste census.

Rahul Gandhi accused the BJP of being “anti-Bahujan.” The clear meaning is that his father and forefather refused to execute a caste-based census, which might have far-reaching effects and even permanently fracture India’s social fabric. This may be negative for caste-based beneficiaries. The last caste census in India was conducted in 1931 by the British government. Those times were different from the present scenario. The data was made public and became the basis for the Mandal Commission Reports and reservation policies for Other Backward Classes. Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) has clarified that the caste-based population count data will not be used for core politics. But the agenda for politics is always twisted and expanded.

The Central Government also joined the legal debate by filing an affidavit with the Supreme Court, leaving the matter unresolved. India’s partition, rooted in the divide-and-rule strategy, is frequently cited as a cautionary tale. Including caste in official census data could further deepen social divides. This issue has become a political pressure point, with various states pushing the Centre for action. Although the Constitution uses the term “class” instead of “caste,” the Supreme Court has consistently ruled that caste is a relevant, and at times, sole or dominant criterion for defining a backward class.

After the release of caste-based census data in Bihar, discussions around conducting similar censuses have gained momentum in states like Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, and Jharkhand. Karnataka, which has already conducted its own caste census, may release its data soon as well.

Notably, all these states are governed by anti-BJP parties. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi also announced that Congress-ruled states have committed to carrying out caste censuses. Meanwhile, the BJP has remained silent on the matter, creating a significant roadblock.

Caste-based censuses focus on proportional representation in areas like jobs and education, with the argument that this will aid in targeted planning for the disadvantaged. However, the situation remains unclear, much like a foggy winter morning. The BJP’s stance on caste-based censuses and reservations seems different, as they fear the caste-based calculations could fragment their traditional Hindu voter base—an underlying concern for the party.

Professor Sanjay Kumar from The Centre for the Study of Developing Societies, says, “Let alone the BJP; no party can openly oppose it; it is not free from danger. BJP gets a large number of votes from the OBC community, their population across the country would be around 52%. Another downside is that the caste-based censuses could disrupt the balance of socio-economic zones. Data theft is a common issue in government systems, and people may feel disconnected from their actual rights.

The moot question is that if the financial status of an ST/SC/OBC or Dalit citizen moves up by a few notches, will his social status change automatically? The lifestyle of any class will only change when the income of a particular class is changed. The actual source of income is employment. The reality is that only metro cities have enough place and space for workers. Aside from the GIDC and IT sectors, less than 30% of industries have their own designated vacancy periods. After a decade, the Jamnagar and Rajkot Corporations have opened their doors to newcomers alongside experienced staff. However, age and caste bias often operate behind the scenes. It’s important to recognise that poverty is also widespread among many upper-caste individuals, and their needs cannot be overlooked. In the overall interests of the nation, terms like SC/ST/OBC, Dalits, etc. must be deleted from the nation’s vocabulary. Every citizen should have only one classification, that of being an ‘Indian’, in the spirit of the constitution.

Last year, when the Bihar government decided to conduct a caste survey in the state, the BJP was also Nitish Kumar’s partner in the state government, and it supported it. Political expert and former professor of Tata Institute of Social Science, Pushpendra Kumar, says, “It is not that the BJP does not talk about caste. It tries to reveal the caste of the Prime Minister as well. For caste politics, the BJP also tried hard to raise the issue of Pasmanda Muslims.”

(The writer is a management professional based in Ahmedabad. Views personal.)

Comments


bottom of page