top of page

By:

Madhukar Mazire

12 November 2024 at 3:30:20 am

India Needs a Credit Repair Framework—Not Permanent Financial Punishment

India’s financial system has made remarkable progress in expanding credit access. Yet, there is a quiet crisis unfolding beneath the surface—millions of otherwise responsible borrowers remain locked out of formal credit due to temporary financial distress experienced during extraordinary times. The COVID-19 pandemic, followed by economic disruptions, medical emergencies, and employment instability, pushed many individuals into short-term loan defaults. These were not cases of wilful...

India Needs a Credit Repair Framework—Not Permanent Financial Punishment

India’s financial system has made remarkable progress in expanding credit access. Yet, there is a quiet crisis unfolding beneath the surface—millions of otherwise responsible borrowers remain locked out of formal credit due to temporary financial distress experienced during extraordinary times. The COVID-19 pandemic, followed by economic disruptions, medical emergencies, and employment instability, pushed many individuals into short-term loan defaults. These were not cases of wilful negligence, but of systemic shock. However, our credit reporting and scoring mechanisms continue to treat such defaults as permanent red flags, often without scope for contextual review or rehabilitation. Recently, I submitted a proposal to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the Ministry of Finance urging the introduction of a structured Credit Repair and Rehabilitation Framework—one that balances credit discipline with economic realism and human fairness. Why Credit Repair Matters Now India is aiming to become a $5 trillion economy, driven by consumption, entrepreneurship, and MSME growth. Yet, credit exclusion acts as a silent brake on this ambition. When salaried professionals, small entrepreneurs, and self-employed workers are denied access to loans years after a one-time crisis default, we unintentionally push them toward informal lending, higher interest rates, or economic stagnation. A rigid “once-defaulted, always-risky” approach may protect balance sheets in the short term, but it undermines long-term credit expansion and trust in the formal system. Learning from Global Practices Globally, regulators are rethinking this approach. For instance, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has recently introduced a regulated credit repair mechanism allowing borrowers with limited, time-bound overdue records from crisis periods to restore creditworthiness. Importantly, this does not weaken credit discipline—it strengthens it by distinguishing temporary hardship from habitual default. India, with its robust digital banking and credit infrastructure, is well-positioned to design an even more nuanced and accountable framework. What a Balanced Framework Could Look Like A well-regulated credit rehabilitation policy could include: • Eligibility limited to crisis-period defaults, officially notified by regulators • Caps on overdue amount and frequency • Mandatory cooling-off periods and improved repayment behaviour • Bank-led review and approval mechanisms • Clear RBI guidelines for credit bureaus on data correction and updating Such a framework would be conditional, transparent, and auditable, ensuring no dilution of systemic risk controls. Economic Inclusion Is Economic Strength Credit systems are not merely risk filters—they are economic enablers. A borrower who recovers, repays consistently, and rebuilds financial discipline should not remain excluded indefinitely due to a past crisis. True financial inclusion is not just about opening accounts or issuing loans—it is about allowing recovery, rebuilding trust, and restoring dignity within the system. The Way Forward This is an opportune moment for RBI and the Finance Ministry to initiate a structured consultation with banks, NBFCs, credit bureaus, economists, and consumer representatives to explore a calibrated credit repair framework tailored for India. Second chances, when governed responsibly, do not weaken economies—they strengthen them. As India charts its next phase of growth, our credit policies must evolve from being purely punitive to progressively rehabilitative, without compromising prudence.

Clever seat selection helped BJP to secure historic win

The party won 65 seats against Congress, 37 against NCP (SP) and 29 against Shiv Sena (UBT)

Clever seat selection

Mumbai: The BJP’s strategic seat sharing with the allies has proved beneficial for the party. An analysis of the Assembly election results show that the BJP has scored over its main rival, the Congress, in a big way because of the direct fights.


The analysis shows that BJP defeated all three constituents of the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) – Congress, Shiv Sena (UBT) and NCP (SP) – in the direct fights. This is attributed as one of the reasons for the BJP’s historic poll success.

ree

The BJP contested 147 out of 288 seats. In 76 constituencies, it faced Congress. BJP secured victory in 65 seats and lost only 11 seats, making it a whopping 86 per cent of the total direct fights. This was followed by an even stronger performance against NCP (SP). Of the total 39 fights with Sharad Pawar’s party, BJP captured 37 seats making it 95 per cent of the total fights with NCP (SP). BJP and Shiv Sena (UBT) were head-to-head in 32 constituencies, of which BJP emerged victorious in 29 seats, making this 91 per cent of the total direct contests.


According to a BJP strategist the party had bargained hard with its allies, Shiv Sena and NCP to get the desired constituencies in the seat sharing formula. “We had studied to potential candidates of the MVA. That helped us in choosing the seats where we can register comfortable victories,” the strategist said.


BJP spokesperson Niranjan Shetty attributed the success to all the party workers who worked hard to boost development, infrastructure in the state. He gave credit to Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis for his contribution to the party’s success.


Shetty pointed out that in 2019, Uddhav Thackeray had stalled all the “novel” and “legendary” projects that Fadnavis had started when he had taken over as CM, making it very easy for the people of Maharashtra to strike a comparison between both the leaders and the potential they had for serving the people. “Devendra Fadnavis gave up his post very easily for the larger good. There are many such examples like Venkaiah Naidu who was BJP National President and later worked as the Vice President of India because that was the need of the hour. We seldom care about our posts,” Shetty told The Perfect Voice.


Congress spokesperson Atul Londhe refused to call the election results as the people’s mandate. “This is not at all a Janata mandate. Despite Maharashtra struggling with so many basic social issues, how can BJP acquire such a huge mandate is the question. If a student copies and fails with just passing marks, it can go unnoticed, but if a student copies and bags the number one position, something is fishy. Why is the BJP scared of ballot papers?” he said.

Comments

bottom of page