top of page

By:

Rajendra Pandharpure

15 April 2025 at 2:25:54 pm

Parth tightens grip on NCP

A contentious candidate selection in the Legislative Council election suggests a decisive shift in NCP’s internal balance of power Pune: Ahead of the Legislative Council elections for the Local Self-Government Constituencies, MP and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) General Secretary Parth Pawar now appears to wield decisive influence over the party’s internal decision-making. The NCP had staked its claim to the Pune Local Self-Government Constituency seat in the Legislative Council and,...

Parth tightens grip on NCP

A contentious candidate selection in the Legislative Council election suggests a decisive shift in NCP’s internal balance of power Pune: Ahead of the Legislative Council elections for the Local Self-Government Constituencies, MP and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) General Secretary Parth Pawar now appears to wield decisive influence over the party’s internal decision-making. The NCP had staked its claim to the Pune Local Self-Government Constituency seat in the Legislative Council and, during seat-sharing negotiations within the Mahayuti alliance, succeeded in securing it. Given the alliance’s numerical strength across the Pune and Pimpri-Chinchwad Municipal Corporations as well as several municipal councils, the election of the NCP’s nominee is widely regarded as a formality. Yet the seemingly straightforward contest exposed deeper tensions within the party over the question of who would ultimately receive the nomination. Internal Tensions Several senior leaders were in contention, including former MLA Vilas Lande, Pimpri-Chinchwad City President Yogesh Behl, former MLA Sunil Tingre and former Pune City President Deepak Mankar. Among them, Tingre moved first by filing his nomination papers and subsequently informed the media that he had done so only after receiving instructions from the party leadership. At roughly the same time, Vikram Kakade, son of former MP Sanjay Kakade, also submitted his nomination papers. Soon afterwards, the party officially declared Kakade as its authorised candidate. Senior NCP leader Dilip Walse Patil later clarified that Tingre’s candidature had merely been a ‘dummy’ nomination. The decision triggered visible discontent. Former MLA Vilas Lande openly questioned the basis on which the candidate had been selected, suggesting that financial considerations had outweighed political credentials. In a pointed remark, he observed that while few in the party knew “which mine” Vikram Kakade had emerged from, the organisation had nevertheless ‘discovered’ him. Political observers are scarcely surprised. Kakade is known to be a close associate of Parth Pawar, and speculation had been circulating for days that he would eventually secure the nomination. Before filing their papers, both Sanjay Kakade and his son formally joined the NCP. The move was significant. As a former BJP MP, Sanjay Kakade had been entrusted with major campaign responsibilities during both the 2017 Pune Municipal Corporation elections and the 2024 Lok Sabha polls. Long regarded as a close confidant of Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, his departure from the BJP has generated considerable discussion in Maharashtra’s political circles. More consequential than the defection itself, however, is what it reveals about the evolving power structure within the NCP. The episode has reinforced perceptions that Parth Pawar played a pivotal role in the candidate-selection process. While Sunetra Pawar formally occupies the position of National President, many within the party increasingly view Parth Pawar as the figure exercising substantial influence over strategic decisions. The sharpest indication of the unease this transition has generated came from Vilas Lande. His lament that “we have been left helpless following the demise of Ajitdada; we now have no one standing by our side” was more than a personal grievance. It reflected a wider sentiment among sections of the party’s old guard who appear uncertain about their place in an organisation undergoing a rapid redistribution of influence. Whether the Kakade candidature proves electorally consequential remains to be seen. But the events surrounding its selection have already served a larger political purpose: they have illuminated the emergence of a new centre of authority within the NCP. As power arrangements continue to evolve, the repercussions are likely to extend beyond Pune, shaping political calculations across Western Maharashtra in the months ahead.

Clever seat selection helped BJP to secure historic win

The party won 65 seats against Congress, 37 against NCP (SP) and 29 against Shiv Sena (UBT)

Clever seat selection

Mumbai: The BJP’s strategic seat sharing with the allies has proved beneficial for the party. An analysis of the Assembly election results show that the BJP has scored over its main rival, the Congress, in a big way because of the direct fights.


The analysis shows that BJP defeated all three constituents of the Maharashtra Vikas Aghadi (MVA) – Congress, Shiv Sena (UBT) and NCP (SP) – in the direct fights. This is attributed as one of the reasons for the BJP’s historic poll success.


The BJP contested 147 out of 288 seats. In 76 constituencies, it faced Congress. BJP secured victory in 65 seats and lost only 11 seats, making it a whopping 86 per cent of the total direct fights. This was followed by an even stronger performance against NCP (SP). Of the total 39 fights with Sharad Pawar’s party, BJP captured 37 seats making it 95 per cent of the total fights with NCP (SP). BJP and Shiv Sena (UBT) were head-to-head in 32 constituencies, of which BJP emerged victorious in 29 seats, making this 91 per cent of the total direct contests.


According to a BJP strategist the party had bargained hard with its allies, Shiv Sena and NCP to get the desired constituencies in the seat sharing formula. “We had studied to potential candidates of the MVA. That helped us in choosing the seats where we can register comfortable victories,” the strategist said.


BJP spokesperson Niranjan Shetty attributed the success to all the party workers who worked hard to boost development, infrastructure in the state. He gave credit to Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis for his contribution to the party’s success.


Shetty pointed out that in 2019, Uddhav Thackeray had stalled all the “novel” and “legendary” projects that Fadnavis had started when he had taken over as CM, making it very easy for the people of Maharashtra to strike a comparison between both the leaders and the potential they had for serving the people. “Devendra Fadnavis gave up his post very easily for the larger good. There are many such examples like Venkaiah Naidu who was BJP National President and later worked as the Vice President of India because that was the need of the hour. We seldom care about our posts,” Shetty told The Perfect Voice.


Congress spokesperson Atul Londhe refused to call the election results as the people’s mandate. “This is not at all a Janata mandate. Despite Maharashtra struggling with so many basic social issues, how can BJP acquire such a huge mandate is the question. If a student copies and fails with just passing marks, it can go unnoticed, but if a student copies and bags the number one position, something is fishy. Why is the BJP scared of ballot papers?” he said.

Comments

bottom of page