As China races ahead with the world’s largest hydropower dam on the YarlungTsangpo, India counters with its own ambitious Siang project in Arunachal Pradesh.
In the remote but geopolitically sensitive corners of Arunachal Pradesh, the quiet flow of the Siang River has become the backdrop to a turbulent contest of national security and ecological stakes. The state’s decision to pursue the 11,000 MW Siang hydropower project is seen as a riposte to the hydrological and geopolitical crisis instigated by China’s gargantuan 60,000 MW dam on the YarlungTsangpo in Tibet.
This looming Chinese project has been described as a potential ‘hydro bomb’ capable of triggering flash floods or crippling water shortages downstream in India and Bangladesh, causing water to become a weapon in future Sino-Indian tensions. By constructing the Siang dam, India aims to mitigate these risks while asserting its sovereignty over the river’s flow.
The 2,900-kilometer Brahmaputra—known as the YarlungTsangpo in Tibet and the Jamuna in Bangladesh—supports millions across three nations, yet is a fault line for conflict. Historically, rivers in South Asia have been central to disputes, from the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 between India and Pakistan to skirmishes over the Teesta River between India and Bangladesh.
China’s recent approval of the Tsangpo dam marks a new phase of hydraulic hegemony. With a proposed capacity to generate 300 billion kilowatt-hours annually, this dam would overshadow even the Three Gorges Dam, the current global leader. Positioned near the ‘Great Bend,’ where the river takes a sharp southward turn into India, the project amplifies downstream nations’ vulnerability to China’s control over water resources.
India’s Siang dam project, though significantly smaller in scale, is envisioned as a strategic countermeasure. However, indigenous communities, organized under the Siang Indigenous Farmers Forum (SIFF), have vociferously opposed the dam, citing concerns of mass displacement and ecological devastation.
The Siang region is a biodiversity hotspot, with fragile ecosystems already under strain from deforestation and climate change. Critics argue that constructing a mega-dam here could trigger landslides and disrupt the region’s seismic stability. Notably, the recent earthquake in Tibet, which claimed over 120 lives, underscores the geological fragility of the Himalayan belt. Environmentalists warn that tampering with this terrain could unleash catastrophic consequences for millions downstream.
China’s dam, too, has drawn environmental scrutiny. Though Beijing has touted it as a cornerstone of its carbon-neutral ambitions, experts point to the peril of altering water flows in such a volatile region. Bangladesh, the Brahmaputra’s final downstream recipient, stands particularly exposed to the double jeopardy of reduced water availability and increased flood risks.
For India, the Siang project, more than an engineering challenge, is a geopolitical necessity. China has consistently weaponized infrastructure projects to assert dominance, from its Belt and Road Initiative to its construction of border roads in disputed territories. The YarlungTsangpo dam fits this pattern, doubling as a tool of soft power and hard leverage.
For India’s part, the Siang dam would not only generate electricity but also serve as a bulwark against sudden water releases by China, whether intentional or accidental.
The battle over the Brahmaputra and its tributaries is emblematic of a 21st-century reality: water, once considered an inexhaustible resource, is now a flashpoint for conflict. As climate change exacerbates water scarcity, the competition over transboundary rivers will intensify. For India, the Siang dam is a bold though fraught attempt to secure its hydrological future.
The question, however, remains if can megaprojects like these ever truly address the complexities of geopolitics and ecology, or do they merely shift the risk downstream? As New Delhi and Beijing escalate their hydropower race, millions who depend on these rivers may find themselves swept up in a deluge of unintended consequences.
Comments