top of page

By:

Correspondent

23 August 2024 at 4:29:04 pm

Civilizational Confidence

For decades, independent India suffered from a peculiar form of historical insecurity. A nation that inherited one of the world’s oldest living civilizations often appeared reluctant to speak confidently about its own past. While political independence was achieved in 1947, intellectual independence remained elusive in the Nehruvian era and the decades thereafter. That is why the Ministry of Culture’s recent efforts to showcase India’s civilizational heritage on social media and other...

Civilizational Confidence

For decades, independent India suffered from a peculiar form of historical insecurity. A nation that inherited one of the world’s oldest living civilizations often appeared reluctant to speak confidently about its own past. While political independence was achieved in 1947, intellectual independence remained elusive in the Nehruvian era and the decades thereafter. That is why the Ministry of Culture’s recent efforts to showcase India’s civilizational heritage on social media and other platforms deserve applause. Consider the famous Pashupati Seal discovered at Mohenjo-daro. Dating back more than four millennia, the steatite seal depicts a seated figure in a yogic posture surrounded by animals, believed to be a proto-Shiva figure. While scholars may continue to debate its precise interpretation, what is impossible to deny is that India remains the living cultural inheritor of the civilization that produced such artefacts. Civilizational continuity is determined by living traditions. The yogic practices, Shaivite symbolism, ritual forms, philosophical concepts, and cultural motifs that emerged across millennia continue to animate Indian life today. The thread connecting ancient India to modern Bharat was never severed. The Ministry’s celebration on X of a 4,500-year-old terracotta dice from the Indus-Saraswati Civilization similarly highlights the important truth that cultural memory endures even when empires vanish. Predictably, these efforts have triggered outrage from a familiar ecosystem of professional contrarians, ideological activists masquerading as scholars, and academics who seem to regard any positive articulation of Indian civilization and Hinduism as a threat. For this crowd, India’s past must always be fragmented, contested, and stripped of continuity. The moment Indians speak of civilizational inheritance, they are accused of ‘myth-making.’ Any interpretation that strengthens a sense of civilizational continuity is treated with suspicion, while theories that sever Indians from their own historical inheritance are celebrated as sophisticated and progressive. For decades, this self-appointed priesthood of the Indian Left-liberal academy exercised an extraordinary monopoly over historical discourse. Their approach was remarkably consistent. Hindu traditions were to be endlessly deconstructed and disparaged. Civilizational pride was to be treated as inherently suspect. Meanwhile, fashionable western academic jargon was deployed to obscure what was often little more than ideological prejudice. What particularly irritates this ecosystem is that Bharat today is increasingly refusing to seek such permission. The return of Chola-era copper plates from the Netherlands, announced by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, forms part of this larger civilizational recovery. These records illuminate the maritime power and global reach of the Chola Empire. Likewise, the documentation of more than 8.5 million manuscripts under the Gyan Bharatam National Survey of Manuscripts represents one of the most significant cultural preservation exercises in modern Indian history. Such initiatives expose the intellectual bankruptcy of those who spent decades insisting that India’s civilizational consciousness was little more than a modern political invention. The Ministry of Culture’s recent initiatives reflect something more important than mere government messaging. They reflect a nation rediscovering its historical confidence after decades of elite condescension.

Dangerous Departures

Updated: Oct 30, 2024

Dangerous Departures

In yet another shocking incident adding to Mumbai’s infamous tryst with stampedes, chaos erupted at Mumbai’s Bandra Terminus following a weekend stampede that left at least ten persons injured, two critically so. A crowd surged toward the Gorakhpur-bound train with nearly 1,500 people vying for seats in 22 unreserved compartments, leading to the stampede. Several others narrowly avoided tragedy, with some even pushed onto the tracks. This is not a unique episode but rather a recurring theme in Mumbai’s bedevilled crowd management, one that has haunted the city’s public spaces, particularly as festive seasons magnify the crowds.


Mumbai is no stranger to stampedes. A horrifying incident in 2017 at Elphinstone Road Station left 23 people dead and nearly 50 injured. The cause was a familiar one: an overwhelming crowd confined to a narrow footbridge during peak rush hour. The tragedy sparked an outcry, with promises from authorities to upgrade infrastructure and enhance safety protocols. Yet seven years on, crowd-related incidents continue to be a constant danger. Today’s incident reveals a similar lapse—a lack of foresight in managing the thousands who gather on platforms ahead of Diwali, eager to return to family. That the Gorakhpur Express was unreserved and heavily crowded was predictable.


The issue lies beyond simply crowd density; it is emblematic of deeper systemic negligence. The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), responsible for local public safety, along with the Railways Ministry, bear responsibility for ensuring order at such high-risk hubs. Although the BMC acknowledged the “festive rush,” it appears little was done to pre-empt it. Swift action could have been taken to either disperse the crowd or reroute passengers. Instead, chaos prevailed.


Political reaction has been swift but uninspiring. Aaditya Thackeray, son of Uddhav Thackeray, launched a scathing attack on the Union Railways Minister, Ashwini Vaishnaw, branding the incident a result of the minister’s “incapable” leadership. This hardly addresses the immediate need: a substantive plan to manage crowds and prevent similar incidents.


Mumbai’s transport infrastructure remains sorely outdated. Platforms are undersized, signalling systems frequently falter, and crowd control mechanisms are grossly inadequate. Despite repeated accidents, there has been little investment in comprehensive crowd management systems or the deployment of personnel trained in emergency response. While railway footbridges were widened after the Elphinstone tragedy, Bandra’s incident demonstrates that such incremental changes are insufficient. Mumbai, which sees a swelling populace during festivals, demands a robust strategy to address its vulnerabilities. This should include technology-driven crowd monitoring, clear communication channels to inform passengers of platform conditions, and additional security and medical staff on high-demand days. It is essential that crowd management training for personnel becomes a priority rather than a reaction to tragedies.

Comments

bottom of page