top of page

By:

C.S. Krishnamurthy

21 June 2025 at 7:45:51 pm

Strong India, Cautious Investor

The Indian economy appears stronger than the nervousness visible in the stock market might suggest. Corporate earnings are improving, domestic demand remains reasonably resilient and several sectors are reporting healthy growth. Yet investors are facing an unusual mix of risks: crude oil is moving towards $100 a barrel, global bond yields are rising, foreign investors have turned sellers again and parts of the Indian market remain expensive. That leads to a simple investment message: India's...

Strong India, Cautious Investor

The Indian economy appears stronger than the nervousness visible in the stock market might suggest. Corporate earnings are improving, domestic demand remains reasonably resilient and several sectors are reporting healthy growth. Yet investors are facing an unusual mix of risks: crude oil is moving towards $100 a barrel, global bond yields are rising, foreign investors have turned sellers again and parts of the Indian market remain expensive. That leads to a simple investment message: India's growth story remains intact, but investors should not mistake a strong economy for a risk-free stock market. The latest corporate results offer considerable comfort. The economic momentum built over the past few quarters has not been derailed by geopolitical tensions. The margin pressure feared across several industries has also been less severe than expected. More importantly, earnings growth has been reasonably broad based. Large, mid and small companies have all shown healthy growth. If oil-related businesses, which are somewhat different in their earnings pattern, are excluded, the gap between the three market segments is not particularly wide. Financial services have been among the strongest performers, with banks, NBFCs and capital-market businesses reporting good growth. Capital goods, metals, telecom and power have also done well. For investors, this is significant. A stock market supported by genuine improvement in corporate profits has a much stronger foundation than one driven merely by enthusiasm. Domestic Risk The monsoon, however, remains an important domestic risk. Rainfall has been below normal so far, although the impact on the rural economy has not yet been alarming. Tractor and two-wheeler sales remain reasonably strong, suggesting that parts of rural India continue to spend. At the same time, increased demand under the rural employment guarantee programme suggests that weaker rainfall may be affecting poorer rural households more severely. Food inflation adds another complication. Higher food prices may improve the income of farmers who sell their produce, but they also increase the expenses of families who buy food. Therefore, higher food inflation cannot automatically be interpreted as stronger rural purchasing power. India is nevertheless better prepared than it once was. A healthy IPO market is a positive development. It allows companies to raise capital and gives investors fresh opportunities. But there is a point at which too much supply begins competing for the same pool of money. The current market provides a striking example. The much-awaited IPO of the National Stock Exchange is reportedly being considered at a size of around Rs. 24,000 to Rs. 25,000 crore, down from earlier expectations of Rs. 30,000 crore but a very large issue nonetheless. The message is not that investors should avoid IPOs. It is that an exciting new issue should not automatically be preferred over an established company merely because the new issue is attracting headlines. The bigger uncertainties are global. Brent crude has moved close to $100 a barrel as tensions in the Middle East have intensified. For India, which imports most of its energy requirements, expensive crude can mean higher inflation, a wider trade deficit and pressure on economic growth. US bond yields are another concern. Higher yields make dollar investments more attractive and can reduce the appetite for emerging markets such as India. This does not necessarily mean that global investors have abandoned India. It shows how quickly investment decisions can change when oil prices, interest rates and currencies move. Domestic investors, particularly mutual fund investors, therefore have an important role in providing stability. Their regular investments can partly offset foreign selling, although domestic flows cannot make the market immune to global shocks. Faster Growth The enthusiasm for small and mid-cap stocks is understandable. Many of these companies offer faster growth and have rewarded investors handsomely. But if investors pay too much for expected growth, even a good company's share price can disappoint. Large-cap companies, after a period of relative underperformance, may offer more comfortable valuations and greater stability. The right mix will depend on an investor’s financial goals, investment horizon and ability to withstand market fluctuations. India’s economic story remains encouraging. Corporate earnings are healthy, domestic demand has resilience and the economy has become better equipped to absorb individual shocks. But the stock market is not the economy. For the common investor, therefore, the most useful question today may not be, “What should I buy?” It may be, “Is my portfolio balanced enough to withstand what I cannot predict?” (The writer is a retired banker and author. He can be reached at krs1957@hotmail.com. Views personal.)

Gun Violence in America

Writer: Vishwas Pethe
Vishwas Pethe
Dec 27, 2024
3 min read

Updated: Jan 2, 2025

Gun Violence in America

On December 16, 2024, tragedy struck Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin, where a 15-year-old student, Natalie Rupnow, fatally shot a fellow student and a teacher before taking her own life. Six others were injured, with two in critical condition. This devastating event is a grim reminder of the United States' ongoing struggle with gun violence, particularly in schools.


A Long History of Gun Ownership in America

The issue of gun violence in the United States cannot be discussed without acknowledging its deep-rooted history of gun ownership. The right to bear arms is enshrined in the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1791, which states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”


Initially, this amendment was intended to empower citizens to form militias for self-defense during a time when standing armies were distrusted. Over the centuries, however, the interpretation of the Second Amendment has evolved. Today, it is often cited as a justification for individual gun ownership, a concept reinforced by landmark court cases such as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which affirmed an individual's right to own firearms for self-defense.


Gun culture is deeply ingrained in American society, with nearly 400 million firearms in civilian hands—more guns than people. This level of accessibility, coupled with a powerful gun lobby led by organizations like the National Rifle Association (NRA), has made significant legislative reform difficult.


Gun Violence in Numbers

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), firearms cause approximately 40,000 deaths annually in the United States—equivalent to 109 deaths per day. This figure includes homicides, suicides, and accidental shootings. Among children and teenagers, firearms are now the leading cause of death, surpassing motor vehicle accidents.


School shootings are a particularly horrifying aspect of gun violence in America. Since 1990, there have been over 800 incidents in K-12 schools, resulting in more than 500 deaths and over 1,000 injuries. High-profile tragedies such as the Columbine High School massacre (1999), the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting (2012), and the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School attack (2018) have shocked the nation and the world, yet meaningful reforms remain elusive.


A Global Comparison

The United States stands out among developed nations for its high rate of gun violence. In countries like Australia, Canada, and much of Europe, strict gun control measures have significantly reduced firearm-related deaths. For example: By contrast, the firearm-related death rate in the United States is 12.2 per 100,000 people, significantly higher than other developed nations. The prevalence of guns and the lack of uniform gun control laws contribute to this disparity.


Challenges in Addressing Gun Violence

Efforts to reduce gun violence in the U.S. have faced significant obstacles. One of the most notable is the prohibition of federal funding for gun violence research. In 1996, Congress passed the Dickey Amendment, effectively barring the CDC from studying gun violence as a public health issue. Although the funding ban was partially lifted in 2019, its legacy has left the country with a limited understanding of the causes and solutions to gun violence.


Advocates have long called for measures such as:

• Universal Background Checks: Closing loopholes in gun sales to ensure that all firearm purchases are subject to background checks.

• Safe Storage Laws: Requiring gun owners to store firearms securely to prevent unauthorized access.

• Bans on Certain Firearms: Prohibiting the sale of assault-style weapons, which are often used in mass shootings.


The Debate Over Gun Rights and Reform

The debate over gun control in the United States often pits the rights of gun owners against the need for public safety. Opponents of stricter gun laws argue that restrictions infringe on constitutional rights and fail to address the root causes of violence, such as mental health issues. Proponents, however, point to the success of gun control measures in other countries and the overwhelming public support for policies like background checks.


A Way Forward

Despite the challenges, there is growing momentum for change. Grassroots organizations, survivors of gun violence, and some lawmakers are advocating for comprehensive reforms. The Madison school shooting serves as a stark reminder of the urgency of these efforts. As the nation grapples with its gun violence epidemic, it must look to both its history and the experiences of other countries to find a path toward a safer future.


(The author is a resident of US. Views personal.)

Comments

bottom of page