While the storm clouds of the current Punjab farmers’ agitation may have momentarily receded, repeated protests have deepened the rift between the state’s agricultural sector and the broader economy.
Farmer leader Jagjit Singh Dallewal’s acquiescence to medical assistance after the Centre invited the protesting farmers for talks has been interpreted as a sign of a thaw. The 120-odd farmers who joined his fast in solidarity also called off their hunger strikes. However, Dallewal’s acceptance of medical aid is unlikely to resolve the deepening crisis that continues to divide Punjab.
The Centre may be momentarily relieved that the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM), the farmers’ union that led the 2020 agitation, has deferred its plans for protests outside the residences of BJP MPs. Yet, the central issue—farmers’ demand for a legal guarantee on minimum support prices (MSP)—remains unresolved. As the government looks to February 14 for meaningful discussions, the ongoing protests, which have disrupted supply chains and hurt local businesses, have cast a long shadow over Rajpura, the gateway to Punjab.
While Dallewal’s acceptance of medical assistance has brought some calm to the fasting farmers, the broader economic and political ramifications of the protests are unmistakable. The protests have caused significant disruptions, not just in the agricultural sector, but also in the business activities around Punjab’s border regions. Rajpura, once a bustling industrial gateway between Punjab and Haryana, has been crippled by the ongoing unrest. Warehouses of major companies have relocated to Ambala, just across the barricades set up by the Haryana police, while fuel stations, motels and roadside eateries have seen sharp declines in sales.
The economic ramifications of the protests are felt most acutely in Punjab’s industrial sector. Punjab, once the engine of India’s industrial expansion, is now facing a shift in its economic trajectory. With frequent disruptions to supply chains and skyrocketing transportation costs due to roadblocks, businesses are being forced to either scale back or abandon plans to invest in the state. Industry leaders, long accustomed to quietly grumbling about farmer union activism, are now publicly denouncing the protests for driving up the cost of doing business in Punjab.
The deepening economic and political rift is evident in the shift away from Punjab as a preferred investment destination. While the state government, led by the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), has touted the promise of over 5,300 new investment proposals worth Rs. 84,000 crores, the ground realities tell a different story. The proposed investments, aimed at revitalizing Punjab’s industrial base and creating nearly 4 lakh jobs, are tempered by a reluctance among potential investors. Concerns over the ongoing protests and their impact on the state’s logistics infrastructure are proving to be a deterrent. Several other industries have either delayed or put on hold their projects, with some blaming the state government’s inability to balance farmer interests with those of the broader industrial community.
Industrial and FMCG companies have already shifted warehouses to Ambala, on the other side of Haryana’s barricades. The rising costs of raw materials and transportation disruptions are forcing many businesses to scale down or delay investments.
Repeated protests have created a stark division between the agricultural sector and the broader economy. Once seen as a harmonious blend of industry and agriculture, Punjab now faces a growing rift with local industry leaders openly speaking out against the protests.
While the farmers’ demands, which include assurances on MSP, cannot be ignored, they must also contend with the economic fallout. If the protests continue without resolution, the growing divide between industry and farmers may cripple the state’s future growth. While the government has taken steps to engage in dialogue, the farmers’ movement has exposed a much deeper issue of a fractured social contract, where political calculations overshadow economic realities. The question now is whether the dialogue in February will be enough to heal these wounds, or if the rift between Punjab’s farmers and industry will widen beyond repair.
Comments