The forthcoming Delhi Assembly elections, scheduled for February 5, is set to witness a dramatic political showdown in decades. For the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), it is a chance to reclaim power after 27 years of electoral drought by supplanting Arvind Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Party (AAP).
The party’s last stint in office was in 1998 under Sushma Swaraj’s short-lived tenure. Despite dominating Delhi’s seven parliamentary seats since 2014, the BJP has been unable to translate its robust vote share into an assembly majority.
This time, the BJP has mounted an aggressive campaign with Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the helm. Modi’s call for ‘parivartan’ (change) encapsulates the BJP’s strategy to capitalize on AAP’s perceived vulnerabilities, from corruption allegations to governance lapses. The saffron party is banking on anti-incumbency sentiments and a narrative that portrays the AAP as having lost its moral compass, exemplified by controversies like the so-called ‘Sheesh Mahal’ and the liquor policy scandal.
The AAP, which once marketed itself as the quintessential political outsider, is now grappling with the challenges of incumbency. For a party that soared to power on the promise of clean governance and grassroots reforms, recent scandals have tarnished its image. Allegations of misusing public funds for the luxurious renovation of the Chief Minister’s residence and controversies surrounding the scrapped liquor policy have provided the BJP with ammunition. These issues have been exploited to erode AAP’s credibility as a champion of the common man.
Arvind Kejriwal’s decision to step down amid legal troubles has created a leadership vacuum, albeit temporarily. While the AAP continues to enjoy significant support for its welfare schemes, such as free electricity, water and improved healthcare infrastructure through mohalla clinics, questions linger about its ability to sustain and expand these initiatives. The party’s overt shift towards religiosity in recent campaigns has also drawn criticism, with detractors arguing that it dilutes AAP’s original vision.
The BJP’s consistent vote share is a testament to its entrenched support base in Delhi. Its dominance in parliamentary elections further underscores its appeal in the capital. However, this appeal has not translated into significant gains in the assembly, where local issues often overshadow national narratives.
One of the BJP’s key weaknesses remains its lack of a strong local leader to rival Kejriwal’s stature. The party’s decision to avoid projecting a chief ministerial face, as it did unsuccessfully with Kiran Bedi in 2015, reflects a cautious approach but also highlights the absence of a clear alternative.
The party’s failure to counter AAP’s welfare-driven narrative is another potential Achilles’ heel. While Modi has assured that existing schemes will not be dismantled, the BJP has yet to articulate a compelling vision for governance in Delhi. Moreover, its poor track record in reserved and minority-dominated constituencies could hinder its ability to secure a decisive majority.
Between the BJP and the AAP, one thing appears to be certain: the Congress, once the dominant force in Delhi politics, has now been relegated to the margins. The party’s 15-year reign under Sheila Dikshit today is a distant memory, with its vote share steadily eroding over the past decade. In going hammer and tongs against the AAP, the Congress has shown it lacks the coherence to mount a serious challenge.
Bereft of a cohesive strategy, its campaign has been overshadowed by a series of internal squabbles and defections. Sandeep Dikshit, son of the late Sheila Dikshit, has been forced into the spotlight with a defamation suit against AAP leaders for allegations of ‘collusion’ with the BJP. Even this dramatic gesture feels every bit a sideshow than a serious attempt to reclaim political space.
As the campaign heats up, voters will have to weigh competing visions for Delhi’s future. Will they prioritize continuity, as promised by the AAP, or will they opt for change as championed by the BJP?
Comments