The BJP’s campaign against Waqf Board land claims is energizing its base but is instead exposing fault lines within its leadership.
The opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in Karnataka has found its latest battleground to corner the ruling Congress-led government over the contentious issue of Waqf lands. A recent rally in Belagavi led by senior BJP leaders, was the latest in a series of protests accusing the state’s Waqf Board of overreaching its mandate and laying claim to land owned by Hindu farmers and religious institutions. While this campaign has amplified a long-standing grievance among sections of the BJP’s base, it has also laid bare divisions within the party’s state unit.
The anti-Waqf movement, spearheaded by former minister Ramesh Jarkiholi, comes amid allegations that the board has arbitrarily increased its land holdings to over six lakh acres, a figure that BJP leaders contend lacks transparency. Party firebrands such as Basanagouda Patil Yatnal have framed the issue as a threat to property rights, accusing the Waqf Board of targeting Hindu-owned lands.
Historical tensions over Waqf governance are hardly new. Originating as charitable land endowments during Islamic rule, Waqf properties have frequently been the subject of legal and political disputes in modern India. Critics of the current system argue that it lacks oversight and accountability, often leading to allegations of encroachment and corruption. The BJP’s push for reforms echoes similar actions in Andhra Pradesh, where the board’s powers were curtailed under Chandrababu Naidu’s government.
However, what distinguishes Karnataka’s protests is the political theatre surrounding them. Despite the strong turnout of senior BJP figures at the rally—including Jarkiholi, Arvind Limbavali, and Pratap Simha—several local legislators conspicuously stayed away. The absence of unity has fuelled speculation about deeper fractures within the party, particularly as Yatnal continues to publicly criticize state president B.Y. Vijayendra for alleged ‘adjustment politics’ with the ruling Congress government.
Yatnal, a polarizing figure within the BJP, has become emblematic of the party’s internal strife. His vocal dissent, coupled with a show-cause notice issued by the BJP’s Central Disciplinary Committee, underscores the leadership’s struggle to contain rebellion. These tensions were exacerbated by the BJP’s poor performance in recent bypolls, which Yatnal attributed to compromised leadership and backroom deals with Congress.
The Waqf controversy has thus become both a rallying cry and a flashpoint for Karnataka’s BJP. On the one hand, it allows the party to consolidate its Hindu vote base by framing the issue as a matter of property rights and justice. On the other, it seems to be exacerbating internal divisions within the party at a time when unity is critical.
Karnataka has historically been a bellwether state for the BJP, offering a foothold in the south and a proving ground for its ideological narratives. But as the anti-Waqf agitation gathers momentum, the party’s national leadership faces a delicate balancing act: championing its base’s demands for reform while addressing the fractures that threaten to undermine its cohesion.
In this battle over land and legitimacy, the BJP may find that its real challenge lies not in confronting the Waqf Board but in reconciling the contradictions within its own ranks.
Comments